Category Archives: surveillance

Virgina Drone Laws – Preempted?

Recently the Virginia General Assembly passed a number of bills related to privacy and new technology. Among the bills is one requiring police to obtain a warrant before using a drone for surveillance. As technology increases and privacy has the potential to decrease, it is telling that the Virginia General Assembly realizes this danger and enacted legislation to restrict drone use by government agencies.

The legislation could have far reaching effects as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) considers new regulations. There is more to the Virginia legislation than just protecting privacy, however. It gives certain local governments the power to restrict anyone, including hobbyists, from flying drones, regardless of the weight. This could create huge issues in the future when the FAA allows drone use by commercial operators. Currently the FAA allows hobbyists to fly drones that weigh less than 55 lbs provided they follow safety guidelines. Would the local government ban on drones apply to commercial operators that the FAA has specifically allowed to fly? Would the local law be pre-empted by federal law? We think, yes, the local laws will be preempted by Federal law.

Preemption, by virtue of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, states that when activities are considered more national than local in character then the federal laws related to them preempt, or take precedence, over state laws. To the extent the Virginia law purports to outlaw conduct that Congress or a federal agency with subject matter jurisdiction, here the FAA, has specifically held is or should be legal, there is conflict preemption and the state law is invalid. We expect a challenge to the Virginia state law restricting drone use sooner rather than later, but certainly when the FAA approves the proposed regulations. Further, if the FAA grants a Section 333 exemption to a Virginia operator, that law may get challenged soon.

One of the Antonelli Law Firm’s attorneys lives (and is licensed) in Virginia and is keenly watching the legislation and the associated privacy concerns. While privacy does need to be protected, it seems there are better ways to protect it than a blanket law restricting all drone use. As far back as 2011, privacy concerns were in the news as Texas police used drones in high risk operations. The ACLU had comments then stating they did not disapprove of drones, absolutely. They went on to say that they object to the pervasive use of drone surveillance on the general public. There are many good uses for drones including searching for missing persons and even high risk police operations.   These activities do need to be tempered with privacy protections. However, local laws cannot and should not be those protections.

Something to watch especially for our Virginia residents and clients.

Today guest blog was written by attorney and airline pilot Kate Fletcher who is of counsel to Antonelli Law’s Drone/UAS Practice group. Kate’s aviation experience, along with special counsel Mark Del Bianco’s federal rulemaking and privacy issues experience, greatly add to the firm’s capabilities.

If you would like more information or would like to speak with the firm’s Principal Jeffrey Antonelli call us at 312-201-8310 or use the contact form below.

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)


Your Message

Enter the code below.

Illinois Law Enforcement Drone Report

In accordance with the Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act [725 ILCS 167], the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority is mandated to publish on its publicly available website on July 1 of every year if a law enforcement agency owns one or more drones.

Here are the results, which either shows that Illinois law enforcement agencies are not complying with the new law, or it appears that Illinois is far from being on the cutting edge of utilizing UAS in law enforcement, despite having Google and 1871 as players on its turf. For example, see this YouTube Video showing a Chicago Police Department RC helicopter which clearly seems to fall under the drone reporting requirement

Illinois Drone Report July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 

Agency Champaign County Sheriff’s Office
Number of Drones 1
Date of Purchase March 19, 2008
Model RP Flight Systems-Spectra Flying Wing
Status Inoperative

Agency Downers Grove Police Department
Number of Drones 1
Date of Purchase June 1, 2014
Model UDI
Status Operative
Notes Used for training purposes

Agency Illinois State Police
Number of Drones 1
Date of Purchase Not reported
Model UDI Model number U818A
Status Operative

Note that these toy drones may soon be replaced with more robust UAS once the officers find they get the hang of it

Antonelli Law UAS Practice Group

Whether it is corporate work, privacy concerns, or you want to get a handle on what the FAA is doing or what your company is allowed to do, you will feel comfortable calling a lawyer at Antonelli Law . Our UAS Practice Group billable rates don’t go higher than $350 per hour for our work and many services are far more affordable than that.

Contact Principal Jeffrey Antonelli for a free consultation at or call 312-201-8310 to chat and get to know us. Our passion for leading and learning about UAS is second to none.

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]